- Cost management — The order’s emphasis on reducing out-of-pocket and health plan costs for IVF treatments may require employers to review and potentially adjust their health plans to comply with new regulations or recommendations that emerge from this order. This could involve negotiating with insurance providers to cover IVF treatments more comprehensively.
- Cost reduction — The order calls for a reduction in the costs of IVF and employees’ out-of-pocket costs. Reallocating cost away from an employee’s out-of-pocket expenses to the health plan would make the entire employer health plan more expensive.
- Regulatory compliance — Businesses will need to stay informed about any new policies or regulations that arise from this order. Ensuring compliance with these changes will be crucial to avoiding legal issues.
- Recruiting and retention — Enhancing access to IVF treatments could be a significant benefit for employees, potentially improving employee satisfaction and retention. Corporations might consider promoting these benefits to attract and retain talent.
Executive Order on IVF: What HR Leaders Need to Know
President Donald Trump, while campaigning, promised his administration would ensure invitro fertilization treatments were either covered by insurance or directly paid for.
However, his recent executive order, issued on Feb. 18, stops short of outlining specific policies to accomplish this. Human resources executives are taking a wait-and-see approach to the order, as it directs the assistant to the president for domestic policy to within 90 days.
IVF is a costly procedure, with a single cycle typically ranging from $15,000 to $20,000.
While some employers — primarily large corporations — have expanded fertility benefits, many workers still lack access.
More than 20 states have laws requiring certain health plans to cover some fertility treatments, but these mandates exclude self-funded employer plans, which cover 61% of insured workers.
As a result, only a small percentage of employees benefit from these requirements. Some large employers have turned to third party fertility benefit providers, which operate outside traditional health plans, to offer IVF coverage.
Actions taken at the legislative level
According to legal experts, Congress would have to pass legislation to mandate broader health insurance coverage for IVF.
Recent legislative efforts have stalled. In 2023, the Right to IVF Act was introduced after the Alabama Supreme Court ruled embryos should be considered children, a decision that temporarily disrupted IVF access.
The bill, which aimed to protect IVF access, was blocked in Congress. Another bill, the bipartisan HOPE with Fertility Services Act, sought to amend the Employee Retirement Income Security Act to require insurers to cover infertility treatments, including IVF, but it died in a House of Representatives committee in 2024.
What HR leaders should watch
While this executive order signals a federal focus on IVF access, it does not provide immediate solutions. Employers should monitor policy recommendations expected within 90 days and potential legislative efforts that could mandate insurance coverage.
Still, there are a few points to consider for employers: